in the first debate, we had kind ofn roc omt wch governor romney was both confirming that he would not put new revenue on the table and sinth hwagog b birtanndet sution. you can't sit down with the democrats and say, "i'm going to be bipartisan," and not offer anything. wht e puics ve to offer is revenue. and what the democrats ve to offer is spending cuts. d tt anbaaiwhh fl arbeusnehecod appease their own base effectively, they had both cuts and revenue on the table. that's where we're going t he o f aolion. my worry is the country doesn't know that's what's going to happen. >> kathleen, how would your experience differ if you had watched on nbc, fox, pbs, cnn? diitake a difrence which network you were watching? >> yes, the networks that held much of the debate in split reen iit you to sethe debate through the reaction of the candidate who wasn't speaking. >> and you think that's gfint? >> i think it's significant because it minimizes the likelihood that you're hearing what's being said. and it's tryingo eae teretive frame in which,f someone is eective nonverbally, they can undercut t